On Tuesday 19 March 2013, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hmm, so we may have drivers that (now) work perfectly fine with > module_platform_driver_probe()/platform_driver_probe(), but will start > failing suddenly in the future? They will fail if someone changes the initialization order. That would already break drivers before deferred probing support (and was the reason we added feature in the first place), but now we can be much more liberal with the order in which drivers are initialized, except when they are using platform_driver_probe() > I guess we need a big fat WARN_ON(-EPROBE_DEFER) in > platform_driver_probe() to catch these? Yes, very good idea. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
