On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 9:18 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Friday 15 March 2013, H Hartley Sweeten wrote: >> Arnd, >> >> Ill look at converting the ep93xx pwm driver to the PWM subsystem. The only issue is >> the current driver exposes a sysfs interface that I think is not available in that subsystem. > > You can probably keep providing that interface if you have active users. > >> >* Regarding the use of module_platform_driver_probe, I'm a little worried about >> > the interactions with deferred probing. I don't think there are any regressions, >> > but we should probably make people aware that one cannot return -EPROBE_DEFER >> > from a platform_driver_probe function. >> >> The ep93xx pwm driver does not need to use platform_driver_probe(). It can be changed >> to use module_platform_driver() by just moving the .probe to the platform_driver. This >> driver was added before module_platform_driver() was available and I used the >> platform_driver_probe() thinking it would save a couple lines of code. Since by using platform_driver_probe() the function ep93xx_pwm_probe() is freed after initialization, is better to use module_platform_drive_probe(). IMHO i don't see any good reason to use module_platform_driver() for this driver. Best regards Fabio Porcedda >> I'll change this in a bit. Right now I'm trying to work out why kernel 3.8 is not booting >> on the ep93xx. I had 3.6.6 on my development board and 3.7 works fine but 3.8 hangs >> without uncompressing the kernel. > > Ok, thanks! > > Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
