Re: Single host/multiple hwifs vs. multiple hosts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12-04-08 05:12 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:15, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm wondering what are the differences between adding a single IDE host with
>> multiple hwifs vs. adding a separate IDE host for each hwif?
>> Do both ways work?
> 
> Does no one know?

When I first wrote that code, the idea was that if a given chip
had multiple IDE ports (hardware interfaces, or hwifs for short),
then that's how it would be done.  One controller, multiple hwifs.

This was before IDE had anything to do with the SCSI subsystem,
and allowed for things like controller chips which could operate
only a single hwif at any point in time (aka. "serialized").

Nowadays, the code's be hacked beyond recognition from its original form
and intent, so who knows!  :)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux