Re: Single host/multiple hwifs vs. multiple hosts?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 13:15, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm wondering what are the differences between adding a single IDE host with
> multiple hwifs vs. adding a separate IDE host for each hwif?
> Do both ways work?

Does no one know?

Thx again!

> I'm asking because I want to convert the Amiga Buddha IDE driver to the new
> driver model, using Multi Function Devices (many Zorro expansion cards contain
> multiple devices):
>  - A Catweasel expansion card would have:
>      * 2 Buddha IDE MFD cells,
>      * 1 Catweasel floppy MFD cell.
>  - A Buddha expansion card would have:
>      * 3 Buddha IDE MFD cells.
>  - An X-Surf expansion card would have:
>      * 2 Buddha IDE MFD cells,
>      * 1 8390 Ethernet cell.
> Registering a separate IDE host/hwif for each IDE MFD cell would be easier to
> handle than a single IDE host with multiple IDE hwifs.
>
> Thanks in advance!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux