On 一, 2012-02-13 at 21:48 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, February 13, 2012, Lin Ming wrote:
> > From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > ACPI Power Resource can power on/off a couple of devices.
> > Introduce interfaces to register/unregister a device to/from
> > an ACPI Power Resource.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/acpi/power.c | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 2 +
> > 2 files changed, 130 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/power.c b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > index 0d681fb..a7e2305 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/power.c
> > @@ -84,10 +84,25 @@ struct acpi_power_resource {
> > u32 order;
> > unsigned int ref_count;
> > struct mutex resource_lock;
> > + struct list_head devices; /* list for devices powered by this PR */
> > };
> >
> > static struct list_head acpi_power_resource_list;
> >
> > +/*
> > + * When a power resource is turned on, all the devices are put to an uninitialized
> > + * state although their ACPI states are still D0.
> > + * To handle this, we need to keep a list of all devices powered by the power resource,
> > + * and resume all of them.
> > + * Currently, we only support this case:
> > + * 1) multiple devices share the same power resoruce,
> > + * 2) One device uses One Power Resource ONLY.
>
> This is incorrect. We actually support all combinations.
Agreed.
> However, we don't
> generally support checking what devices depend on the given power resource.
>
Yes.
But all the code in this patch is for runtime D3_COLD support only.
At least for the BIOS code on hand, a device that support runtime
D3_COLD uses one ACPI Power Resource only.
We can add the support for all combinations if there are such kind of
BIOS in the market, which I do not think there would be.
Besides, as a RFC version, I do not want to make a over designed
proposal at the beginning.
> > + */
> > +struct acpi_powered_device {
> > + struct list_head node;
> > + struct device *dev;
> > +};
> > +
> > /* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Power Resource Management
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> > @@ -455,6 +470,118 @@ int acpi_disable_wakeup_device_power(struct acpi_device *dev)
> > Device Power Management
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
> >
> > +int acpi_power_resource_register_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle)
> > +{
> > + struct acpi_power_resource *resource;
> > + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, *res_dev;
> > + acpi_handle res_handle = NULL;
> > + struct acpi_powered_device *apd;
> > + int i;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!handle || !dev)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto no_power_resource;
> > +
> > + if (!acpi_dev->power.flags.power_resources)
> > + goto no_power_resource;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i <= ACPI_STATE_D3; i++) {
> > + struct acpi_device_power_state *ps = &acpi_dev->power.states[i];
> > +
> > + if (!ps->flags.valid)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (ps->resources.count > 1)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + if (!res_handle)
> > + res_handle = ps->resources.handles[0];
> > + else if (res_handle != ps->resources.handles[0])
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> I'm not sure what the above checks are needed for. It seems that this function
> will only be called from acpi_bus_add_power_resource() (which needs to be
> modified for this purpose, BTW), so it doesn't need to check all those things
> (those checks have been made already).
>
No. These two APIs are introduced to support the runtime D3_COLD remote
wakeup. And they should be invoked by drivers, either in driver code or
via bus layer code.
Say, ATA port, who has _PR3 in its ACPI node, knows that it can enter
D3_COLD at run time, and it supports remote wakeup in D3_COLD because it
has _S0W (return value 4).
When remote wakeup event is triggered, there is an ACPI event sent to
the ATA controller/port, which sets the ATA controller/port back to D0
state.
At this time, what we actually need is to resume the ZPODD, rather than
the ATA controller/port. To follow the runtime PM model (runtime resume
starts from leaf devices), ATA code can use these two APIs to tell ACPI
to runtime resume ZPODD device directly, because ZPODD is powered by
this Power Resource as well.
thanks,
rui
> > +
> > + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(res_handle, &res_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto no_power_resource;
> > +
> > + resource = res_dev->driver_data;
> > + if (!resource)
> > + goto no_power_resource;
> > +
> > + apd = kzalloc(sizeof(struct acpi_powered_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!apd)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + apd->dev = dev;
> > + mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> > + list_add_tail(&apd->node, &resource->devices);
> > + mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> > + printk(KERN_INFO PREFIX "Device %s uses Power Resource %s\n", dev->kobj.name, acpi_device_name(res_dev));
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +no_power_resource:
> > + printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "Invalid Power Resource to register!");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void acpi_power_resource_unregister_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle)
> > +{
>
> Who is supposed to call this one?
>
> > + struct acpi_power_resource *resource;
> > + struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, *res_dev;
> > + acpi_handle res_handle = NULL;
> > + struct acpi_powered_device *apd, *tmp;
> > + int i;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!handle || !dev)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(handle, &acpi_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + if (!acpi_dev->power.flags.power_resources)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i <= ACPI_STATE_D3; i++) {
> > + struct acpi_device_power_state *ps = &acpi_dev->power.states[i];
> > +
> > + if (!ps->flags.valid)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (ps->resources.count > 1)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + res_handle = ps->resources.handles[0];
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + if (!res_handle)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ret = acpi_bus_get_device(res_handle, &res_dev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + resource = res_dev->driver_data;
> > + if (!resource)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(apd, tmp, &resource->devices, node) {
> > + if (apd->dev == dev) {
> > + list_del(&apd->node);
> > + kfree(apd);
> > + }
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > int acpi_power_get_inferred_state(struct acpi_device *device, int *state)
> > {
> > int result = 0;
> > @@ -550,6 +677,7 @@ static int acpi_power_add(struct acpi_device *device)
> >
> > resource->device = device;
> > mutex_init(&resource->resource_lock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource->devices);
> > strcpy(resource->name, device->pnp.bus_id);
> > strcpy(acpi_device_name(device), ACPI_POWER_DEVICE_NAME);
> > strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_POWER_CLASS);
> > diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > index 6cd5b64..32fb899 100644
> > --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h
> > @@ -322,6 +322,8 @@ int acpi_bus_get_status(struct acpi_device *device);
> > int acpi_bus_set_power(acpi_handle handle, int state);
> > int acpi_bus_update_power(acpi_handle handle, int *state_p);
> > bool acpi_bus_power_manageable(acpi_handle handle);
> > +int acpi_power_resource_register_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle);
> > +void acpi_power_resource_unregister_device(struct device *dev, acpi_handle handle);
> > bool acpi_bus_can_wakeup(acpi_handle handle);
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROC_EVENT
> > int acpi_bus_generate_proc_event(struct acpi_device *device, u8 type, int data);
>
> Thanks,
> Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
