[PATCH] Ensure we actually allow UDMA/100

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We were limiting to UDMA/66 instead.
---
Jeff,

Can this get folded in? Just realized the bitmask I used from Alan's patch wasn't right as it didn't actually allow UDMA/100, it was setting the max at UDMA/66. This simple fixup has been boot tested.

-Dan

 drivers/ata/pata_sis.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c b/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
index 54c41c7..810b7d6 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_sis.c
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ static unsigned long sis_133_mode_filter(struct ata_device *adev, unsigned long
 	pci_read_config_dword(pdev, port, &t1);
 	/* if ATA133 is disabled, mask it out */
 	if (!(t1 & 0x08))
-		mask &= ~(0xE0 << ATA_SHIFT_UDMA);
+		mask &= ~(0xC0 << ATA_SHIFT_UDMA);
 	return mask;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.6.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux