On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 12:02 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:38:36 +0200, Peter Zijlstra said: > > On Wed, 2011-06-22 at 21:59 -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@xxxxxx wrote: > > > [ 20.254275] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at: > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8106973b>] mark_irqflags+0xf2/0x13e > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff810699b2>] __lock_acquire+0x22b/0x3e2 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8106a09f>] lock_acquire+0x103/0x153 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8157bb01>] _raw_spin_lock+0x36/0x45 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8110ddf8>] end_writeback+0x33/0x103 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff81125425>] bdev_evict_inode+0x3e/0xbe > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8110df78>] evict+0xb0/0x173 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8110e1ea>] iput_final+0x171/0x17a > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8110e241>] iput+0x4e/0x53 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff81125cad>] __blkdev_put+0x1c0/0x1eb > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff81125ebe>] blkdev_put+0x1e6/0x1f5 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8121d143>] register_disk+0xea/0x13c > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8121d2c4>] add_disk+0x12f/0x1a4 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff812ef339>] sd_probe_async+0x115/0x1b5 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff8105ce2f>] async_run_entry_fn+0x99/0x12a > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff810505e8>] process_one_work+0x25d/0x467 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff81051ddb>] worker_thread+0x152/0x206 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff810561fa>] kthread+0x7f/0x87 > > > [ 20.254275] [<ffffffff815835d4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10=20 > > > > That looks broken. Not having -mm, is there a git tree some place?, I > > cannot quite see how end_writeback() is taking mapping->tree_lock as my > > version looks like: > > > > void end_writeback(struct inode *inode) > > { > > might_sleep(); > > BUG_ON(inode->i_data.nrpages); > > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_data.private_list)); > > mm-fix-assertion-mapping-nrpages-==-0-in-end_writeback.patch does this: > > diff -puN fs/inode.c~mm-fix-assertion-mapping-nrpages-==-0-in-end_writeback fs/inode.c > --- a/fs/inode.c~mm-fix-assertion-mapping-nrpages-==-0-in-end_writeback > +++ a/fs/inode.c > @@ -423,7 +423,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(remove_inode_hash); > void end_writeback(struct inode *inode) > { > might_sleep(); > + /* > + * We have to cycle tree_lock here because reclaim can be still in the > + * process of removing the last page (in __delete_from_page_cache()) > + * and we must not free mapping under it. > + */ > + spin_lock(&inode->i_data.tree_lock); > BUG_ON(inode->i_data.nrpages); > + spin_unlock(&inode->i_data.tree_lock); > BUG_ON(!list_empty(&inode->i_data.private_list)); > BUG_ON(!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)); > BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_CLEAR); > > Adding Jan Kara to the list, and stable@xxxxxxxxxx because the patch was cc'ed to there... Yep, that very much wants to be spin_{un,}lock_irq(). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html