On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:34:17PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote: > > That looks like the right thing to do. For ipr's usage of > > libata, we don't have the concept of a port frozen state, so this flag > > should really never get set. The alternate way to fix this would be to > > only set ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN in ata_port_alloc if ap->ops->error_handler > > is not NULL. > > It seemed like ipr is as you say, but I wasn't sure if it was > appropriate to make the change above in the common libata-scis code or > not. I don't want to break some other device on accident. > > Also, I tried your suggestion, but I don't think that can happen in > ata_port_alloc? ata_port_alloc is allocated ap itself, and it seems like > ap->ops typically gets set only after ata_port_alloc returns? Maybe we can test error_handler in ata_sas_port_start()? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
