Re: Intel ICH9M bug : sata unusable with usbserial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 06:05:56PM +0100, Philippe De Muyter wrote:
>   5:      17183    XT-PIC-XT-PIC    ata_piix, ata_piix, ehci_hcd:usb1, ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb3, uhci_hcd:usb5, uhci_hcd:usb6, uhci_hcd:usb7, uhci_hcd:usb8

So, usb7 and ata_piix share the same IRQ line.

> [    1.517781] usb 7-1: New USB device found, idVendor=067b, idProduct=2303
> [    1.517837] usb 7-1: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=0
> [    1.517883] usb 7-1: Product: USB-Serial Controller
> [    1.517928] usb 7-1: Manufacturer: Prolific Technology Inc.
...
> [    4.327431] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial
> [    4.327585] USB Serial support registered for generic
> [    4.327747] usbcore: registered new interface driver usbserial_generic
> [    4.327774] usbserial: USB Serial Driver core
...
> [    4.419657] USB Serial support registered for pl2303
...
> [    4.431805] usb 7-1: pl2303 converter now attached to ttyUSB0
> [    4.431846] usbcore: registered new interface driver pl2303
> [    4.431875] pl2303: Prolific PL2303 USB to serial adaptor driver

I believe this is the GPS thingie?

...
> [  175.706014] ata1: lost interrupt (Status 0x50)
> [  175.706040] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
> [  175.706050] ata1.00: failed command: READ DMA
> [  175.706062] ata1.00: cmd c8/00:08:28:41:01/00:00:00:00:00/e1 tag 0 dma 4096 in
> [  175.706064]          res 40/00:00:01:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
> [  175.706079] ata1.00: status: { DRDY }

There was no screaming IRQ but it definitely looks like IRQ delivery
is gone at this point.

> [  175.706091] ata1: hard resetting link
> [  176.162049] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> [  181.165024] ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x27)
> [  181.165034] ata1.00: failed to read native max address (err_mask=0x4)
> [  181.165043] ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)

Hardreset and IDENTIFY are executed by polling on ata_piix and
READ_NATIVE_MAX is the first command executed using IRQ and that's the
first thing in the recovery sequence which fails.

> [  181.165054] ata1: hard resetting link
> [  181.621053] ata1: SATA link up 3.0 Gbps (SStatus 123 SControl 300)
> [  191.624025] ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x27)
> [  191.624036] ata1.00: failed to read native max address (err_mask=0x4)
> [  191.624045] ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
> [  191.624053] ata1: limiting SATA link speed to 1.5 Gbps
> [  191.624065] ata1: hard resetting link
> [  192.080046] ata1: SATA link up 1.5 Gbps (SStatus 113 SControl 310)
> [  202.083023] ata1.00: qc timeout (cmd 0x27)
> [  202.083033] ata1.00: failed to read native max address (err_mask=0x4)
> [  202.083042] ata1.00: revalidation failed (errno=-5)
> [  202.083049] ata1.00: disabled
> [  202.083066] ata1: hard resetting link

And it never comes back.  Specifying kernel parameter 'irqpoll' might
help but it looks like somehow the GPS thingie kills the IRQ line
completely.

cc'ing Greg and linux-usb.  Hey, USB folks, it seems accessing a USB
GPS device kills IRQ delivery to ata_piix sharing the same IRQ line as
the USB host.  Any ideas on what's going on?  The original messages
can be read from...

  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg40425.html
  http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg40428.html

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux