Hello.
I wrote:
The caller expects this function to return the DMA channel number on success,
while it returns 0...
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
The patch is against the recent Linus' tree.
drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
#undef DRV_NAME
#undef DRV_VERSION
#define DRV_NAME "sata-dwc"
-#define DRV_VERSION "1.1"
+#define DRV_VERSION "1.2"
/* SATA DMA driver Globals */
#define DMA_NUM_CHANS 1
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static int dma_dwc_xfer_setup(struct sca
/* Program the CTL register with src enable / dst enable */
out_le32(&(host_pvt.sata_dma_regs->chan_regs[dma_ch].ctl.low),
DMA_CTL_LLP_SRCEN | DMA_CTL_LLP_DSTEN);
- return 0;
+ return dma_ch;
}
Does not seem a real issue as DMA_NUM_CHANS is 1. How NCQ is going to work
though with 1 DMA channel? :-O
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
