Re: libata: implement on-demand HPA unlocking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/11/2011 1:25 PM, Alan Cox wrote:
>> When?  Is there any specific case you can think of?
> 
> Think about a raid volume where it is full disk and then the magic
> autolocking crap guesses wrong, the volume goes partly inaccessible while
> the box is running. Nasty mess.

So a whole disk raid volume that was built with a patched kernel that
always unlocked and therefore invaded the HPA gets upgraded and now the
array won't activate.  So now we have the intersection of two rare
configurations ( most people use partitions rather than the whole disk
), plus an upgrade.  Valid, but quite rare, and of course, they would
get the same problem if they ran the unpatched Linus kernel right now.
Seems to me this rare failure is the fault of using the patched kernel
and invading the HPA in the first place.

So you either leave the kernel as it is today and have this one problem,
or you patch it to always unlock, and get several other problems.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux