On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 09:33:18AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 01/25/2011 07:08 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > >> All in one, a very intriguing idea IMO, and the hardest bits > >> (lowlevel x86 transition) is all implemented already. > > Lowlevel x86 transition is not at all the hardest part. It's > detail-oriented but well defined (and, I might add, incompletely > implemented -- 64 bits only, not using facilities we already have); > Making the transition code applicable to 32-bit CPUs will hopefully be quite simple: it's mostly a subset of the posted parts. Since I might use that transition code for a different purpose now, any facilities not properly used beside the identity mappings? thanks, -- Darwish http://darwish.07.googlepages.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
