On 2010-12-16 17:45, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On 12/16/2010 05:43 PM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>>>> Kay, Jens, James, how does this look to you guys? >>>> >>>> I like the concept, this is probably what we should have done all along. >>>> The user space method has been tried and failed. So I was mostly laying >>>> it low waiting for feedback before integrating this. >>> >>> Yeah, it's nice stuff. Userspace works, but can not be made entirely >>> safe. We have (rare) bugs we just can not fix otherwise than disabling >>> polling. >>> >>>> Kay? >>> >>> I want it! :) >>> >>> If you merge it, let me know when you have a tree ready, so I can test >>> the most recent version again. >> >> OK good, looks like we all agree... I'll queue it up in for-2.6.38 >> branch and update for-next to have all that stuff. > > Heh, that was fast. Anyways, James, it would be great if you can take > a look at the sr/sd changes. I think they're correct but that's kinda > expected, so... :-) One thing I noticed is that cdrom_check_events() needs an export. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
