Re: [RFC 2/3 v3]update web addresses in stagging

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:51:56PM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> On 09/24/2010 05:34 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:08:56PM -0700, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
> >>The below patch, is a simple fix to a broken web address not using a 
> >>period in it's
> >>name. I'll leave this up to you guys if you want to use it...
> >>
> >>  Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I'll queue it up, thanks.
> >
> >Oh, it's "staging", not "stagging" as you have up there in the Subject:
> >:)
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
> 
> shoot... and I actually changed it from staging to stagging thinking 
> that was correct..(duh)..
> 
> Anyways alright.. I'll exclude this one if the other sets get finalized.

One random suggestion:  Perhaps you should include a date here?  i.e. "URL
blah blah blah (as of Sept 2010)"

That way, people have some idea how much they can trust that URL without
having to dig into the kernel history to see when it was last changed.

Matt

-- 
Matthew Dharm                              Home: mdharm-usb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver

It was a new hope.
					-- Dust Puppy
User Friendly, 12/25/1998

Attachment: pgp0CSixhAAX7.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux