On 2010-09-24 05:51, Mark Lord wrote: > On 10-09-23 10:53 PM, Mark Lord wrote: >> On 10-09-23 08:05 PM, Douglas Gilbert wrote: >>> Mark, >>> If you issued the SG_IO ioctl with a timeout of at >>> least 66 minutes (expressed in milliseconds) then >>> it looks like ata_scsi_queuecmd() has a problem. >> .. >> >> Mmm.. more like blk_execute_rq() perhaps. >> That's where the wait_for_completion(&wait) call is at. >> >> Perhaps I should change it to wait in smaller increments, >> so that the lockup detection doesn't trigger on it.. > .. > > This patch (below) seems to work. > > Does this look kosher enough for me to roll it up > as a proper patch submission? Jens? Joel? Ideally it would be nice to just pass the info down that it should not complain, since waiting > 120 seconds (or whatever the timeout is set to) is expected by the caller in some cases. But your patch is simple enough and it gets the job done. I will queue it up for .37 if you send a properly formatted and signed-off-by version. -- Jens Axboe -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
