Re: ahci rmmodable and shouldn't

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

On 09/20/2010 11:25 AM, Pedro Francisco wrote:
> Discomfort? Not really, sorry if my stubbornness felt like it. No, I'm
> fine with it.

:-)

> I just thought it was weird the change of behaviour from 2.6.32, plus
> felt that the "Used by" field by lsmod was incorrectly set at 0 since
> the module is, in fact, being used (e)

Hmmm... I don't recall the behavior changing from 2.6.32.  Maybe I've
been just speaking bullshit this whole time.  Can you please post the
output of lsmod?  Maybe the difference is caused by the split between
libahci and ahci?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux