On Sat, 11 Sep 2010, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 09/10/2010 10:06 PM, Mikulas Patocka wrote: > > But I have my work rules that I learned: I use no git kernels and no > > external patches (except Alasdair's patchset that I want to test). I only > > use -rc or final kernels. I need a stable computer --- I don't want to > > solve problems like "does it crash because I pulled something or does it > > crash because I made a bug in my code?" So, put that into 2.6.37-rc1 and > > I'll optimize flushes in dm for -rc2 or -rc3. > > Alright, I'm sorry but this is as far as I would go for dm conversion > patches. If you wanna split it further or do it your way, please feel > free to. I think it would be beneficial to do things now but, hey, > you guys are maintaining dm part of the kernel, so it's up to you > guys. But, I think it would be silly for everyone else to wait for > the rather special requirement for dm, so if we have to go forward > without dm updates, I suppose we will have to. Jens, please feel free > to drop dm conversion patches. > > Thanks. > -- > tejun I think: take the first patch and submit it on your own, and send the rest of patches to Alasdair to his tree. If I get such big patches I am unable to immediatelly say if they are correct or not. Mikulas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html