Hello, On 08/18/2010 08:35 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: >> It's not bisecting to find bugs in the barrier conversion. We can't >> easily bisect it down anyway. The problem is when we try to bisect >> other problems and get into the middle of the series barriers suddenly >> are gone. Which is not very helpful for things like data integrity >> problems in filesystems. > > Ah, okay, hmmm.... alright, I'll resequence the patches. If the > filesystem changes can be put into a single tree somehow, we can keep > things mostly working at least for direct devices. Sorry but I'm doing it. It just doesn't make much sense. I can't relax the ordering for REQ_HARDBARRIER without breaking the remapping drivers. So, to keep things working, I'll have to 1. relax the ordering 2. implement new REQ_FLUSH/FUA based interface and 3. use them in the filesystems in the same patch. That's just wrong. And I don't think md/dm changes can or should go through the block tree. They're way too invasive for that. It's a new implementation and barrier won't work (fail gracefully) for several commits during the transition. I don't think there's a better way around it. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
