Hello, On 08/17/2010 07:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 06:23:55PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: >> Yeap, agreed. I couldn't really understand why the the sequence >> needed to be atomic for ide in the first place so just left it alone. >> Do you understand why it tried to be atomic? > > I think initial drafs of the barrier specification talked about atomic > sequences. Except for that I can't think of any reason. Hmm... alright, I'll rip it out. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
