Re: [PATCH 1/2 #upstream] sata_fsl,mv,nv: prepare for NCQ command completion update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 08/02/2010 03:18 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello, Jeff.

On 08/02/2010 01:47 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
So, something like this.  I tested both flavors of sata_nv but don't
have access to sata_mv or sata_fsl, but the conversion is pretty
straight forward and failures should be pretty easy to catch.

applied

Are you planning on applying the second patch too?

sata_mv is behaving weirdly in 2.6.35 + these patches, on the older 6081 chip, embedded in a Dell server box. Looking into it...

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux