That's unfortunate. FYI I have continued to be trouble free, but my processor is a bit weaker than Mark's, although I would find it surprising that this would cause a problem. Also, FYI Mark, I have 12GB of Corsair RAM, and have it bumped up to the Intel XMP profile. P > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Helo, >> >> On 07/20/2010 05:14 AM, Paul Check wrote: >>> Hey Tejun: I guess this is the same patch that you sent me to fix my >>> issue >>> with missing drives. Â Good news: I've been through about 10 reboots >>> now >>> and no problems. Â Based on my prior experience, I'd say with the old >>> setup, 10 clean boots in a row was probably less than a 1% event. Â So, >>> it >>> seems that this has fixed my problem. >> >> Yeap, it's the same one. Â I'm forwarding the patch upstream now but, >> Mark, please let me know the test result. >> >> Thanks. >> >> -- >> tejun >> > > Tejun, > Looks like I had a failure today. First one in weeks and only the > 3rd or 4th boot with this newer patch file. One of the two drives > making a RAID0 wasn't found so /dev/md11 (constructed from /dev/sdd > and /dev/sde) couldn't be started. I did a cold reboot and the drive > was found. > > If it matters, and it probably doesn't, the failure came on a boot > which had a scheduled fsck to do of /dev/md5 - my main / drive. I > don't see how that would make a difference but I figure why leave the > info out. That's why the times are so much larger in the dmesg file. > (I think) > > dmesg attached. I patched the Gentoo kernel if it makes a > difference, same as I did with the earlier patch. > > mark@c2stable ~ $ uname -a > Linux c2stable 2.6.34-gentoo-r2 #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun Jul 18 14:09:48 PDT > 2010 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz GenuineIntel > GNU/Linux > mark@c2stable ~ $ > > Sorry, > Mark > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
