On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:30:28AM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote: > On 04/22/2010 03:23 AM, Fang Wenqi wrote: > > Sorry that the title should be: > > "fix uninitialized variable warning" > > > > not > > "fix unused variable warning" > > > > Need I re-send the patch mail ? > > Yes, please do so. gcc 4.4.1 generates a spurious warning on it too. > > Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> It's not a spurious warning. The code failed to fully initialize all fields of the ata_taskfile structure, prior to copying the ata_taskfile structure into qc->result_tf. Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html