Hi Ben, thanks for the comment. Reply below...
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 5:03 PM, Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:06:50AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
>> .node is being removed
[...]
>> --- a/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c
>> +++ b/sound/soc/fsl/mpc8610_hpcd.c
>> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ static struct snd_soc_ops mpc8610_hpcd_ops = {
>> static int mpc8610_hpcd_probe(struct of_device *ofdev,
>> const struct of_device_id *match)
>> {
>> - struct device_node *np = ofdev->node;
>> + struct device_node *np = ofdev->dev.of_node;
>> struct device_node *codec_np = NULL;
>> struct device_node *guts_np = NULL;
>> struct device_node *dma_np = NULL;
>
> This looks like one case where an inline function would have been a
> help.
In what regard (how would you like it to look)? The node pointer
location is very unlikely to move again, and I prefer the clarity of
direct dereferencing.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
