On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:28:25 +0530 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > There's another problem that afflicts 4k drives emulating 512b: they > have to do a read modify write for any isolated 512b write ... that > leads to potential corruption of adjacent 512b blocks if power is lost > at the moment the write is being done. Since most Linux filesystems are > 4k sectors, misalignment really hammers this, plus most journal writes > seem to be done in 512 byte increments. I suppose for USB this could be > regarded as flakey as usual, though. > Most users assume that a single 512B sector write is atomic as far as power failure is concerned. Hasn't this requirement been carried over to the new 4k physical sector? It seems reasonable that if a 512B sector write is atomic in the older drives, a 4k sector write would also be atomic on the newer drives, since the time required to write it is negligible when compared to capacitor voltage decay and inertia of the disk platters. Anyway, I suppose most of the energy/time required for a sector write operation, is being expended on head assembly positioning and the wait for the correct sector passing under the write head. That is, the write operation itself takes so little time that it should make no difference whether you write 512B or 4k. So the question is: what are hard drive makers guaranteeing (if anything at all)? Was a 512B sector write really atomic? Is a 4k one? Or was it completely manufacturer-dependent to start? Regards Cláudio -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
