On Monday 01 February 2010 08:47:26 am David Miller wrote: > However what I don't like is how this is implemented. We shouldn't > pretend the data structures are the same by using macros in some > header file, we should truly abstract out the data types properly such > that these drivers in fact use the same datastructures. The hardest part is done and the idea is proved so this indeed would be a natural next step.. > For the price of a few series of data structure morphs, we eliminate > the tester-base issue of legacy IDE. There's one driver for both > ATA and legacy IDE, the stuff in front is just a presentation and > probing layer, nothing more. Hmm.. sounds exactly like the direction in which IDE has been going for the last few years.. :) -- Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
