Re: [PATCH #upstream 2/2] libata: implement spurious irq handling for SFF and apply it to piix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/20/2010 06:45 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,

On 01/21/2010 04:33 AM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Overall, as long as the drive is in Bus-Idle mode, it should be safe to
go ahead and read Status, for pretty much every controller and drive.

Hmmm... I was a bit worried about the case Alan mentioned several
times where access to AltStatus while data transfer is going on can
lead to silent data corruption.

If a drive is in Bus-Idle, as I mentioned, then there is no active data transfer.


I would make exception only for the new SATA FIS-based controllers,
where we know that hitting Status is likely both pointless and wasteful,
as well as being superfluous because the newer FIS-based controllers all
have irq status registers.

FIS-based ones need their own interrupt handlers anyway so,
fortunately, things like irq_check callback isn't necessary to begin
with.  :-)

Yep.


Additionally, I think we should have a "fast-timeout" and
"slow-timeout", whereby we check Status after a short period (5
seconds?) to make sure we did not lose an interrupt.  If Status is !BSY,
then we can proceed with handling qc success/failure immediately.

Does this happen often?  What I find more common is just plain
timeouts, so I think it would improve our exception latency if we
apply different timeouts for each trial.  ie. For the first RW try,
set the timeout to 7 secs.  For the second, 15 and then to 30.  This
wouldn't harm the correctness while allowing libata to react much
faster to transient failures.

Lost interrupts do not happen often, but they do happen. Google finds plenty of examples.


Another thing is I can think of which can improve our robustness is
dynamic irqpoll support such that when screaming IRQ happens, IRQ
subsystem not only shuts down the IRQ line but also begins selectively
irqpolling it.

Does this ever happen when data transfer is active? AFAIK this happens during probe or reset or set-xfer or bus-idle or some other auxiliary moment in time.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux