Re: [PATCH #upstream-fixes 2/2] libata: implement spurious irq handling for SFF and apply it to piix

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/15/2010 07:23 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
>> Because different controllers have different mechanisms for detecting
>> pending IRQ?
> 
>   All SFF-8038i (BMIDE) controllers have the same mechanism. They may
> have some additional interrupt bits though, reflecting the interrupt
> status in both PIO and DMA mode though.

Oh, yeah, I was thinking about modern piixs where the bit works as a
true IRQ pending bit regardless of command state (it works while even
idle).  I don't think the original BMIDE IRQ pending bit would be too
useful for spurious IRQ detection.  It's interlocked with DMA transfer
protocol and unless the controller is horribly broken it won't be too
useful for spurious IRQ detection.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux