Re: [PATCH 00/86] PATA fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/03/2009 05:10 PM, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Did the patch contain -cosmetic- changes intermingled with code changes,
in the same code lines? No.

Is it good kernel practice to intermingle cosmetic changes with
functional ones, in the same code lines? Also, no.


In fact, I recall one case where a certain developer on this list used cosmetic code changes (Lindent, IIRC) to hide functional, security-related code changes.

Mixing cosmetic and function changes is simply bad engineering practice, _especially_ when they occur in the same lines of code.

	Jeff



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux