Re: [PATCH 64/86] pata_radisys: unify code for programming PIO and MWDMA timings

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:

It results in ~6% decrease in the driver LOC count and also ~1%
decrease in the driver binary size (as measured on x86-32).

Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/ata/pata_radisys.c |   66 +++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)

Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_radisys.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_radisys.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_radisys.c
@@ -26,20 +26,9 @@
 #define DRV_NAME	"pata_radisys"
 #define DRV_VERSION	"0.4.4"
-/**
- *	radisys_set_piomode - Initialize host controller PATA PIO timings
- *	@ap: ATA port
- *	@adev: Device whose timings we are configuring
- *
- *	Set PIO mode for device, in host controller PCI config space.
- *
- *	LOCKING:
- *	None (inherited from caller).
- */
-
-static void radisys_set_piomode (struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
+static void radisys_set_timings(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev,
+				u8 pio, bool use_mwdma)
 {
-	unsigned int pio	= adev->pio_mode - XFER_PIO_0;
 	struct pci_dev *dev	= to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
 	u16 idetm_data;
 	int control = 0;
@@ -52,7 +41,7 @@ static void radisys_set_piomode (struct
 	 */
static const /* ISP RTC */
-	u8 timings[][2]	= { { 0, 0 },	/* Check me */
+	u8 timings[][2]	= { { 0, 0 },
 			    { 0, 0 },
 			    { 1, 1 },
 			    { 2, 2 },
@@ -62,6 +51,10 @@ static void radisys_set_piomode (struct
 		control |= 1;	/* TIME1 enable */
 	if (ata_pio_need_iordy(adev))
 		control |= 2;	/* IE IORDY */
+	/* If the drive MWDMA is faster than it can do PIO then
+	   we must force PIO0 for PIO cycles. */

   Multi-line comment style should preferrably be:

	/*
	 * blah
	 * blah
	 */

+	if (use_mwdma && adev->pio_mode < (XFER_PIO_0 + pio))
+		control = 1;

   Hm, shouldn't that be 8?

@@ -115,20 +112,8 @@ static void radisys_set_dmamode (struct
 			XFER_PIO_0, XFER_PIO_3, XFER_PIO_4
 		};
 		int pio = needed_pio[mwdma] - XFER_PIO_0;
-		int control = 3;	/* IORDY|TIME0 */
-
-		/* If the drive MWDMA is faster than it can do PIO then
-		   we must force PIO0 for PIO cycles. */
-
-		if (adev->pio_mode < needed_pio[mwdma])
-			control = 1;

   Perhaps there's a bug here?

MBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux