At Fri, 20 Nov 2009 03:48:22 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > On 11/18/2009 08:24 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Missing _SDD is not an error. Don't treat it as one. > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo<tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Reported-by: Takashi Iwai<tiwai@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 15 +++++++++------ > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > hmmmm, do you have a link to the bug report? http://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=551942 But the access is restricted because of SLE*11 stuff (and the machine is too new :) I can forward dmesg of any other information, but ... > How critical is this? Is it a regression fix? ... it's neither critical nor regression fix. Essentially it suppresses the unneeded warning messages at boot (and gives a more clear error code). > We are very late into 2.6.32-rc, where we try to minimize the patches > applied as much as possible. It's fine for 2.6.33, I suppose. thanks, Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
