From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:40:03 -0600 > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 7:19 PM, David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Meanwhile we should provide a way for things to work, and >> realistically the only way to do that currently is to bump the >> WAIT_DRQ value to some large number. >> >> And that's exactly the kind of patch I'm willing to accept for this. > > I agree, it's sub-optimal but it helps.. if the user wants better > behavior they should a) fix it so that the card isn't using PIO, at > least if it supports DMA and b) not use drivers/ide.. Philippe's patch that started this thread uses "3 * HZ / 10" which isn't large enough for the SSD cases. Can someone please post a patch that uses a large enough value? Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
