Re: [PATCH] Serialize CMD643 and CMD646 to fix a hardware bug with SSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:15:59 +0200

> On Thursday 22 October 2009 13:00:49 David Miller wrote:
>> From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:44:04 +0200
>> 
>> > We always did serialization for CMD646, we just used hwif->chipset
>> > == ide_cmd646 (without using IDE_HFLAG_SERIALIZE flag):
>> 
>> I fully acknowledge that we always serialized, sorry for not
>> being explicit.
>> 
>> I was just showing where the serialize IRQ flag got added
>> (and again, it was a correct change).
> 
> What for?  The only patch changing behavior was yours and it seems
> your luck is much worse than mine when it comes to unexpected side
> effects.. ;)

Like I said, you can attribute my actions to malice or ignorance
if you want, but it simply isn't there.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux