Hi Jeff, > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeff Garzik [mailto:jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx] > > The patch certainly seems obviously correct, but normally we > deal with > boring chip names, because marketing names change all the > time. If we > applied "marketing patches" there would be a ton of patches > sent our way. > > If the SB900 simply does not / will not exist, then I'm fine > applying this. > > Otherwise, I would prefer the chip name over the marketing name... "Hudson-2" is not only marketing name, it is the chip name for both internal and external use. SB900 will not be used. So please apply this patch. Thanks, Shane -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
