http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14294 --- Comment #1 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx> 2009-10-12 21:37:00 --- On Monday 12 October 2009, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > Hi! > > > I gave the user a debugging patch, but they reported that they > > can no longer trigger the issue with 2.6.31.1 > > > > See: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-ide&m=125469615425454&w=4 > > > > Maybe that's enough to close this, I dunno. > > I'm the user with the debugging patch, I'd say no, don't close it. > > Even though on my first tests I had the computer to crash the two weekends I > had tested, it seems that crashing on weekend was only luck and seems that > having the bug appear is more difficult than I had thought. > > So... my comments saying that 2.6.31.1 seemed ok are probably wrong (I have > read the .1 changelog and there is an ata patch, but probably unrelated). It > is true that I had 2.6.31.1 running for a whole week without it crashing, > but seems that crashing it may need more time. > > I'm now back to the 2.6.31 with the patch to debug it (3 days uptime) in > order to gather more info and after I get the info from 2.6.31 I'd test > 3.6.31.latest or even 2.6.32whatever in case you find that better. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug.-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
