On Tuesday 22 September 2009 04:36:13 Jung-Ik (John) Lee wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
> <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 September 2009 22:49:35 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >>
> >> Bug fixes, and a new driver.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Please pull from 'upstream-linus' branch of
> >> master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev.git upstream-linus
> >>
> >> to receive the following updates:
> >>
> >> drivers/ata/Kconfig | 9 +
> >> drivers/ata/Makefile | 1 +
> >> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 4 +-
> >> drivers/ata/libata-core.c | 4 +-
> >> drivers/ata/pata_amd.c | 3 +
> >> drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 548 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> drivers/ata/sata_promise.c | 155 +++++++++++--
> >> include/linux/pci_ids.h | 2 +
> >> 8 files changed, 704 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> >>
> >> John(Jung-Ik) Lee (1):
> >> libata: Add pata_atp867x driver for Artop/Acard ATP867X controllers
> >
> > That was really fast.. Not necessarily a bad thing but this driver would
> > benefit from few polishing touches..
> >
> >> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..7990de9
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,548 @@
> >> +/*
> >> + * pata_atp867x.c - ARTOP 867X 64bit 4-channel UDMA133 ATA controller driver
> >> + *
> >> + * (C) 2009 Google Inc. John(Jung-Ik) Lee <jilee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> + *
> >> + * Per Atp867 data sheet rev 1.2, Acard.
> >> + * Based in part on early ide code from
> >> + * 2003-2004 by Eric Uhrhane, Google, Inc.
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> >> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> >> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> >> + * (at your option) any later version.
> >> + *
> >> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> >> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> >> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
> >> + * GNU General Public License for more details.
> >> + *
> >> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
> >> + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
> >> + * Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place, Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307 USA
> >> + *
> >> + *
> >> + * TODO:
> >> + * 1. RAID features [comparison, XOR, striping, mirroring, etc.]
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> >> +#include <linux/module.h>
> >> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> >> +#include <linux/init.h>
> >> +#include <linux/blkdev.h>
> >> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> >> +#include <linux/device.h>
> >> +#include <scsi/scsi_host.h>
> >> +#include <linux/libata.h>
> >> +
> >> +#define DRV_NAME "pata_atp867x"
> >> +#define DRV_VERSION "0.7.5"
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * IO Registers
> >> + * Note that all runtime hot priv ports are cached in ap private_data
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> +enum {
> >> + ATP867X_IO_CHANNEL_OFFSET = 0x10,
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * IO Register Bitfields
> >> + */
> >> +
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT = 4,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_RECOVER_SHIFT = 0,
> >> +
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_SHIFT = 0,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK = 0x07,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_SHIFT = 4,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK = 0x70,
> >> +
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_6 = 0x07,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_5 = 0x06,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_4 = 0x05,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_3 = 0x04,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_2 = 0x03,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_1 = 0x02,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_0 = 0x01,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_DISABLE = 0x00,
> >> +
> >> + ATP867X_IO_SYS_INFO_66MHZ = 0x04,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_SYS_INFO_SLOW_UDMA5 = 0x02,
> >> + ATP867X_IO_SYS_MASK_RESERVED = (~0xf1),
> >> +
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTSPD_VAL = 0x1143,
> >> + ATP867X_PREREAD_VAL = 0x0200,
> >> +
> >> + ATP867X_NUM_PORTS = 4,
> >> + ATP867X_BAR_IOBASE = 0,
> >> + ATP867X_BAR_ROMBASE = 6,
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +#define ATP867X_IOBASE(ap) ((ap)->host->iomap[0])
> >> +#define ATP867X_SYS_INFO(ap) (0x3F + ATP867X_IOBASE(ap))
> >> +
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE(ap, port) (0x00 + ATP867X_IOBASE(ap) + \
> >> + (port) * ATP867X_IO_CHANNEL_OFFSET)
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_DMABASE(ap, port) (0x40 + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_STATUS(ap, port) (0x07 + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_ALTSTATUS(ap, port) (0x0E + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +
> >> +/*
> >> + * hot priv ports
> >> + */
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_MSTRPIOSPD(ap, port) (0x08 + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_SLAVPIOSPD(ap, port) (0x09 + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_8BPIOSPD(ap, port) (0x0A + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE(ap, port) (0x0B + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_DMABASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_PORTSPD(ap, port) (0x4A + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +#define ATP867X_IO_PREREAD(ap, port) (0x4C + \
> >> + ATP867X_IO_PORTBASE((ap), (port)))
> >> +
> >> +struct atp867x_priv {
> >> + void __iomem *dma_mode;
> >> + void __iomem *mstr_piospd;
> >> + void __iomem *slave_piospd;
> >> + void __iomem *eightb_piospd;
> >> + int pci66mhz;
> >> +};
> >> +
> >> +static inline u8 atp867x_speed_to_mode(u8 speed)
> >> +{
> >> + return speed - XFER_UDMA_0 + 1;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void atp867x_set_dmamode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
> >> + struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
> >> + u8 speed = adev->dma_mode;
> >> + u8 b;
> >> + u8 mode;
> >> +
> >> + mode = atp867x_speed_to_mode(speed);
> >
> > The driver currently doesn't support MWDMA modes but claims otherwise
> > (fixed in the attached patch).
> >
> >> + /*
> >> + * Doc 6.6.9: decrease the udma mode value by 1 for safer UDMA speed
> >> + * on 66MHz bus
> >> + * rev-A: UDMA_1~4 (5, 6 no change)
> >> + * rev-B: all UDMA modes
> >> + * UDMA_0 stays not to disable UDMA
> >> + */
> >> + if (dp->pci66mhz && mode > ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_0 &&
> >> + (pdev->device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP867B ||
> >> + mode < ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_UDMA_5))
> >> + mode--;
> >> +
> >> + b = ioread8(dp->dma_mode);
> >> + if (adev->devno & 1) {
> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK) |
> >> + (mode << ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_SHIFT);
> >> + } else {
> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK) |
> >> + (mode << ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_SHIFT);
> >> + }
> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned char clocks = clk;
> >> +
> >> + switch (clocks) {
> >> + case 0:
> >> + clocks = 1;
> >> + break;
> >> + case 1 ... 7:
> >> + break;
> >> + case 8 ... 12:
> >> + clocks = 7;
> >
> > Shouldn't "clocks = 0" (the default case) be used here?
>
> The clocks value 0 sets it to 8 clocks, while value 7 sets to 12 clocks.
This would explain it but then there is no need to use "clocks = 7"
for the _input_ "clocks == 7".
> I cleaned up a bit on clocks_shift. See the patch below.
>
> > Otherwise it seems to result in underclocked timings for dp->pci66mhz == 0.
> >
> >> + break;
> >> + default:
> >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
> >> + "Using default 8clk.\n", clk);
> >> + clocks = 0; /* 8 clk */
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned char clocks = clk;
> >> +
> >> + switch (clocks) {
> >> + case 0:
> >> + clocks = 1;
> >> + break;
> >> + case 1 ... 11:
> >> + break;
> >> + case 12:
> >> + clocks = 0;
> >> + break;
> >> + case 13: case 14:
> >> + --clocks;
> >> + break;
> >
> > Is "clocks == 14" a reserved setting?
>
> 12 is reserved for the default (== 0), and 13, 14 are set to value 12,
> 13 respectively.
I meant the _output_ "clocks == 14" here.
> >
> > If so a comment documenting it would be appreciated.
>
> Sure. see the new patch below.
>
> >
> >> + case 15:
> >> + break;
> >> + default:
> >> + printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: recover %dclk is invalid. "
> >> + "Using default 15clk.\n", clk);
> >> + clocks = 0; /* 12 clk */
> >
> > Shouldn't it use "clocks == 15" setting?
> It was a typo. 12 is the right default.
>
> >
> >> + break;
> >> + }
> >> + return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_RECOVER_SHIFT;
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
> >> +{
> >> + struct ata_device *peer = ata_dev_pair(adev);
> >> + struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
> >> + u8 speed = adev->pio_mode;
> >> + struct ata_timing t, p;
> >> + int T, UT;
> >> + u8 b;
> >> +
> >> + T = 1000000000 / 33333;
> >> + UT = T / 4;
> >> +
> >> + ata_timing_compute(adev, speed, &t, T, UT);
> >> + if (peer && peer->pio_mode) {
> >> + ata_timing_compute(peer, peer->pio_mode, &p, T, UT);
> >> + ata_timing_merge(&p, &t, &t, ATA_TIMING_8BIT);
> >> + }
> >> +
> >> + b = ioread8(dp->dma_mode);
> >> + if (adev->devno & 1)
> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_SLAVE_MASK);
> >> + else
> >> + b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK);
> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
> >> +
> >> + b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(t.active) |
> >> + atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
> >> + if (dp->pci66mhz)
> >> + b += 0x10;
> >
> > What is the purpose of the above hack?
>
> For safe PIO mode according to spec.
>
> >
> > AFAICS (I don't have a datasheet) it may result in invalid active
> > clocks being used for t.active > 12 and 0x80 bit being set incorrectly
> > for t.active values 7..12 (unless it was the purpose of the hack).
>
> See the patch below..
>
> >
> >> + if (adev->devno & 1)
> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->slave_piospd);
> >> + else
> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->mstr_piospd);
> >> +
> >> + /*
> >> + * use the same value for comand timing as for PIO timimg
> >> + */
> >> + iowrite8(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
> >
> > This is incorrect if slave/master devices use different PIO modes
> > or if PIO mode <= 2 is used by any device.
> >
> > Timing based on t.act8b and t.rec8b values should be used instead.
>
> act8b and rec8b have the same values as active, recovery of the port.
Please take a look at drivers/ata/libata-core.c::ata_timing[] table:
...
{ XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 0, 600, 0 },
{ XFER_PIO_1, 50, 290, 93, 383, 125, 100, 0, 383, 0 },
{ XFER_PIO_2, 30, 290, 40, 330, 100, 90, 0, 240, 0 },
{ XFER_PIO_3, 30, 80, 70, 180, 80, 70, 0, 180, 0 },
{ XFER_PIO_4, 25, 70, 25, 120, 70, 25, 0, 120, 0 },
{ XFER_PIO_5, 15, 65, 25, 100, 65, 25, 0, 100, 0 },
{ XFER_PIO_6, 10, 55, 20, 80, 55, 20, 0, 80, 0 },
...
For PIO modes <= 2 (or if master/slave devices use different PIO modes)
we'll have different values, i.e. for PIO2 in case of a single device on
the port using standard timings we'll have:
t.active = 4
t.recovery = 4
t.act8b = 10
t.rec8b = 2
Most likely we won't see much use of this driver with older devices,
however this should not stop us from supporting them and at the same
time making the driver easier to maintain.
> If a:r=3:1 then they become 4:1 on 66mhz for safer transfer, and
> a8:r8=3:1, which is identical but the a8 should be incremented by 1.
> I can use a8:r8 with 66mhz fixup but it becomes the same as using a:r.
> Take a look at the patch below.
>
> >
> > On the somehow related note:
> >
> > * I don't see how PIO0-2 command timings can be met with only 3 bits
> > used for active clocks. Could it be that dp->eight_piospd should be
> > programmed in a slightly different way than dp->{mstr,slave}_piospd?
> >
>
> See new patch on clocks_shift below.
>
> > * The controller allows higher clocks values for recovery timings but
> > ata_timing_compute() tries to fairly increase both recovery and active
> > timings to meet the required cycle timing.
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static int atp867x_cable_detect(struct ata_port *ap)
> >> +{
> >> + return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
> >> +}
> >
> > As noticed by Robert and Alan already:
> >
> > This should use ATA_CBL_PATA_UNK and rely on the driver-side cable detection.
>
> I modified cable_detect() to use override; on a certain
> subsystem_vendor|device, its 40short, others, unknown.
>
> >
> >
> > One last thing: Power Management support is missing from this driver
> > (I tried addressing this in the separately posted patch but it needs
> > testing by somebody with the hardware).
> >
> >
> > MWDMA fix:
> >
> > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: [PATCH] pata_atp867x: fix it to not claim MWDMA support
> >
> > MWDMA modes are not supported by this driver currently.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 10 +---------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> > @@ -118,20 +118,13 @@ struct atp867x_priv {
> > int pci66mhz;
> > };
> >
> > -static inline u8 atp867x_speed_to_mode(u8 speed)
> > -{
> > - return speed - XFER_UDMA_0 + 1;
> > -}
> > -
> > static void atp867x_set_dmamode(struct ata_port *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
> > {
> > struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
> > struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
> > u8 speed = adev->dma_mode;
> > u8 b;
> > - u8 mode;
> > -
> > - mode = atp867x_speed_to_mode(speed);
> > + u8 mode = speed - XFER_UDMA_0 + 1;
> >
> > /*
> > * Doc 6.6.9: decrease the udma mode value by 1 for safer UDMA speed
> > @@ -471,7 +464,6 @@ static int atp867x_init_one(struct pci_d
> > static const struct ata_port_info info_867x = {
> > .flags = ATA_FLAG_SLAVE_POSS,
> > .pio_mask = ATA_PIO4,
> > - .mwdma_mask = ATA_MWDMA2,
>
> This looks good to me. thx.
>
> > .udma_mask = ATA_UDMA6,
> > .port_ops = &atp867x_ops,
> > };
> >
>
>
> From: John(Jung-Ik) Lee <jilee@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> clarifications in timings calculations and cable detection
>
> Signed-off-by: John(Jung-Ik) Lee <jilee@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> pata_atp867x.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 files changed, 37 insertions, 13 deletions
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> index e6c4706..c1c691f 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
> @@ -156,8 +156,10 @@ static void atp867x_set_dmamode(struct ata_port
> *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
> iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
> }
>
> -static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
> +static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(struct ata_port *ap,
> + unsigned int clk)
> {
> + struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
> unsigned char clocks = clk;
>
> switch (clocks) {
> @@ -166,15 +168,25 @@ static int
> atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
> break;
> case 1 ... 7:
> break;
> - case 8 ... 12:
> + case 9 ... 12:
> clocks = 7;
> break;
> default:
> printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
> "Using default 8clk.\n", clk);
> - clocks = 0; /* 8 clk */
> - break;
> + case 8: /* default 8 clk */
> + clocks = 0;
> + goto active_clock_shift_done;
> }
> +
> + /*
> + * Doc 6.6.9: increase the clock value by 1 for safer PIO speed
> + * on 66MHz bus
> + */
> + if (dp->pci66mhz && clocks < 7)
> + clocks++;
> +
> +active_clock_shift_done:
> return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
> }
>
> @@ -188,20 +200,19 @@ static int
> atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(unsigned int clk)
> break;
> case 1 ... 11:
> break;
> - case 12:
> - clocks = 0;
> - break;
> case 13: case 14:
> - --clocks;
> + --clocks; /* by the spec */
> break;
> case 15:
> break;
> default:
> printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: recover %dclk is invalid. "
> "Using default 12clk.\n", clk);
> - clocks = 0; /* 12 clk */
> + case 12: /* default 12 clk */
> + clocks = 0;
> break;
> }
> +
> return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_RECOVER_SHIFT;
> }
>
> @@ -230,10 +241,8 @@ static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port
> *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
> b = (b & ~ATP867X_IO_DMAMODE_MSTR_MASK);
> iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
>
> - b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(t.active) |
> + b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(ap, t.active) |
> atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
> - if (dp->pci66mhz)
> - b += 0x10;
>
> if (adev->devno & 1)
> iowrite8(b, dp->slave_piospd);
> @@ -246,9 +255,24 @@ static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct ata_port
> *ap, struct ata_device *adev)
> iowrite8(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
> }
>
> +static int atp867x_cable_override(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + if (pdev->subsystem_vendor == PCI_VENDOR_ID_ARTOP &&
> + (pdev->subsystem_device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP867A ||
> + pdev->subsystem_device == PCI_DEVICE_ID_ARTOP_ATP867B)) {
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int atp867x_cable_detect(struct ata_port *ap)
> {
> - return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(ap->host->dev);
> +
> + if (atp867x_cable_override(pdev))
> + return ATA_CBL_PATA40_SHORT;
> +
> + return ATA_CBL_PATA_UNK;
> }
>
> static struct scsi_host_template atp867x_sht = {
Thanks, your patch looks good to me but since there are still some
leftover issues left we would also need something like the incremental
patch below:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] pata_atp867x: PIO support fixes
* use 8 clk setting for active clocks == 7 (was 12 clk)
* use 12 clk setting for active clocks > 12 (was 8 clk)
* do 66MHz bus fixup before mapping active clocks
* fix setup of PIO command timings
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Index: b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_atp867x.c
@@ -155,30 +155,31 @@ static int atp867x_get_active_clocks_shi
struct atp867x_priv *dp = ap->private_data;
unsigned char clocks = clk;
+ /*
+ * Doc 6.6.9: increase the clock value by 1 for safer PIO speed
+ * on 66MHz bus
+ */
+ if (dp->pci66mhz)
+ clocks++;
+
switch (clocks) {
case 0:
clocks = 1;
break;
- case 1 ... 7:
- break;
- case 9 ... 12:
- clocks = 7;
+ case 1 ... 6:
break;
default:
printk(KERN_WARNING "ATP867X: active %dclk is invalid. "
- "Using default 8clk.\n", clk);
+ "Using 12clk.\n", clk);
+ case 9 ... 12:
+ clocks = 7; /* 12 clk */
+ break;
+ case 7:
case 8: /* default 8 clk */
clocks = 0;
goto active_clock_shift_done;
}
- /*
- * Doc 6.6.9: increase the clock value by 1 for safer PIO speed
- * on 66MHz bus
- */
- if (dp->pci66mhz && clocks < 7)
- clocks++;
-
active_clock_shift_done:
return clocks << ATP867X_IO_PIOSPD_ACTIVE_SHIFT;
}
@@ -193,7 +194,8 @@ static int atp867x_get_recover_clocks_sh
break;
case 1 ... 11:
break;
- case 13: case 14:
+ case 13:
+ case 14:
--clocks; /* by the spec */
break;
case 15:
@@ -235,16 +237,16 @@ static void atp867x_set_piomode(struct a
iowrite8(b, dp->dma_mode);
b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(ap, t.active) |
- atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
+ atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.recover);
if (adev->devno & 1)
iowrite8(b, dp->slave_piospd);
else
iowrite8(b, dp->mstr_piospd);
- /*
- * use the same value for comand timing as for PIO timimg
- */
+ b = atp867x_get_active_clocks_shifted(ap, t.act8b) |
+ atp867x_get_recover_clocks_shifted(t.rec8b);
+
iowrite8(b, dp->eightb_piospd);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
