On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 12:34:39AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: > Commit a5bfc4714b3f01365aef89a92673f2ceb1ccf246 dropped explicit > pci_intx() manipulation from ahci because it seemed unnecessary and > ahci doesn't seem to be the right place to be tweaking it if it were. > This was largely okay but there are exceptions. There was one on an > embedded platform which was fixed via firmware and now bko#14124 > reports it on a HP DL320. > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14124 > > I still think this isn't something libata drivers should be caring > about (the only ones which are calling pci_intx() explicitly are > libata ones and one other driver) but for now reverting the change > seems to be the right thing to do. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> > Reported-by: Thomas Jarosch <thomas.jarosch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> In the future, for stuff that you want sent to stable, can you also add: Cc: stable <stable@xxxxxxxxxx> in this signed-off-by area? That way, when the patch hits Linus's tree, we get automatically notified of it and I don't have to dig back through log files to try to find out if your commit has made it in or not. thanks, greg "drowning in -stable patches" k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
