RE: [PATCH #upstream, v2] ahci: Implement SATA AHCI FIS-based switching support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tejun,


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tejun Heo [mailto:tj@xxxxxxxxxx] 
> > 
> > I find that ahci_pmp_detach() will be called for each SATA port
> > during the initialization, right after print:
> >> ahci 0000:00:11.0: flags: 64bit ncq sntf ilck pm led clo pmp fbs...
> > 
> > so will ahci_disable_fbs() be called, which leads to the trigger
> > of WARN_ON().
> 
> Ah.. right.  ahci_port_resume() does that to make sure that all PMP
> bits are cleared on init.  Hmmm... probably it would be better to make
> ahci_disable_fbs() to just do it regardless of libata thinks whether
> PMP is attached or not.  After resume from STR, we shouldn't be
> assuming anything about the controller state.


I have added sata_pmp_attached() check for both ahci_enable_fbs()
and ahci_disable_fbs(), because I believe it's necessary.

	if (!pp->fbs_supported || !sata_pmp_attached(ap))
		return;

What do you mean to make it better? How to? I do not catch your
above words very much...


Thanks,
Shane

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux