James Bottomley wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 14:21 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:19 PM, James Bottomley<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 2009-08-17 at 13:08 -0400, Greg Freemyer wrote:
..
Non-coalescing is believed detrimental,
It is? Why?
For the only compliant SSD in the wild, Mark has shown it to be true
via testing.
He only said larger trims take longer. As I said previously, if it's a
X+nY relationship, then we still benefit from accumulation up to some
value of n.
..
Err, what I said was, "rm -rf /usr/src/linux" takes over half an hour
with uncoalesced TRIM, and only a scant few seconds in total *with*
coalesced TRIM.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
