Re: [PATCH 1/4] dmi: fix date handling in dmi_get_year()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tejun Heo wrote:
Year parsing in dmi_get_year() had the following two bugs.

* "00" is treated as invalid instead of 2000 because zero return from
  simple_strtoul() is treated as error.

* "0N" where N >= 8 is treated as invalid of 200N because the leading
  0 is considered to specify octal.

Fix the above two bugs by using endptr to detect invalid number and
forcing decimal.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
While trying to implement dmi_get_date(), spotted two bugs in the
current dmi_get_year().  Tricky date strings.  ;-P

I think it would be safer to postpone this and the next patch for the
next merge window.  There's no reported case of these bugs causing
problems yet, so no reason to risk behavior change at this stage.  If
nobody objects, it would be easiest to push this through
libata-dev#upstream.

Thanks.

 drivers/firmware/dmi_scan.c |    5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Patchset looks good to me... To make life easy, I would prefer to carry patches 1-2 in libata-dev#upstream, as well as patches 3-4. If there are objections to that plan from anyone, speak now... :)


	Jeff




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux