Re: ata_tf_read_block() question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, Atsushi.

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> I have a question on CHS calculation in ata_tf_read_block().
> 
> The calculation in ata_tf_read_block() is:
> 	block = (cyl * dev->heads + head) * dev->sectors + sect;
> 
> but ata_build_rw_tf() does:
> 	track = (u32)block / dev->sectors;
> 	cyl   = track / dev->heads;
> 	head  = track % dev->heads;
> 	sect  = (u32)block % dev->sectors + 1;
> 
> It seems inconsistent.  The correct calculation is:
> 	block = (cyl * dev->heads + head) * dev->sectors + sect - 1;
> isn't it?

Yes, indeed.

> I don't have any real problem.  Just noticed by code reading.

ata_tf_read_block() currently is used only when reporting failed block
address to upper layer so off-by-one bug there wouldn't be too
visible, especially for the venerable CHS addressing.

Care to submit a patch w/ warning message and capping for sect == 0
case?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux