On Monday 10 August 2009 23:20:13 Alan Cox wrote: > > That style of discussion is not the kind of professional attitude > > that we would like to encourage here. > > "We". Would that be the royal we or have you suddenly become 'voice of > the community' ? > > > The rest of your mail is also not worth discussing with as it is made > > of completely made up stuff Seems like the "inconvenient" part of my sentence became M.I.A... Hmmm... > Your professional attitude astounds me. If that is the professionalism > you wish to encourage take it elsewhere.. > > I fixed ide-scsi for 2.4 long ago. Back then it worked. Since then the > people responsible for IDE let it rot. Possibly, I don't know exactly what happened in 2.4, I took over in 2.5.7x. However simply referring to "IDE people breaking things" in this era implies 2.6.x happenings not some 2.4.x or 2.5.x pre-history so please just don't do it as it causes inconvenient misunderstandings.. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
