On Sunday 09 August 2009 18:58:40 Alan Cox wrote: > did before the old IDE people broke ide-scsi support. ide-scsi was an orphan without a single person willing to work on it or trying to fix outstanding problems (which didn't surprise me given that you had to be IDE+SCSI+ide-scsi+st+sr expert to do it). That was not the case with ide-tape (which is at least fixable because it is now mere 2000 LOC and contains no inter-subsystem dependencies). If you miss ide-scsi so much I don't quite understand what stops you from bringing it back to live and stepping in as its Maintainer? :-) The truth is that the change was ACK-ed by everybody except you and you refused to step in as ide-scsi Maintainer.. so please stop defaming hard working people (in this case Fujita and Borislav) and pushing some childish views on what other people should be doing (without putting absolutely no work into it yourself). Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
