On Friday 07 August 2009 19:36:10 David Miller wrote: > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200 > > > Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public > > tree to hold future IDE changes? > > > > If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP. > > IDE is deep maintainence, we shouldn't be doing lots of changes, > cleanups, and things of this nature. So urgency and timeliness > is on a sincerely different scale for it. Nobody is saying anything about cleanups and things of this nature.. > On the other hand, if you've been looking, I've been applying > networking patches to net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 by the truckload > on a daily basis because it is in active development. Excellence in one area doesn't magically translate to other areas, especially when said area needs a completely different approach: I've been looking and I've seen you pushing non-trivial IDE bug-fix patches with almost no wider hardware coverage to upstream (i.e. one of my own patches which has been _explicitly_ marked as needing more linux-next exposure).. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
