Hi Bartlomiej,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > My honest opinion is that it is as appropriate now as it will be 2.6.31.
>> >
>> > [ I'm still amazed by the amount of *completely* bogus reasons given for
>> > not merging it. ]
>>
>> I don't consider this a bogus reason at all:
>>
>> 10 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> Since when do we validate code quality based solely on LOC changed? :)
Since when we entered -rc8 (or even earlier).
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
<bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm yet to see anybody posting a single code chunk in this whole discussion.
That's because I am not objecting to the code. I am objecting to the
fact that you're submitting something as big as this so late in the
release cycle and the fact that it's not a clear-cut bug fix.
But anyway, I don't really want to argue about this. I simply wanted
to point out that I agree with Alan's and James' comments and that I
don't think they have anything to do with "slowing down IDE fixes" but
rather with how the whole release cycle with fixed merge window works.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
