On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 08:59:29 -0400 Greg Freemyer <greg.freemyer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Alan, given your emphatic ack, is libata likely to follow the same > model. Any chance we could have a single boot param that handled both If the patches get in then it makes no sense not to implement them identically in libata. > drivers? I mean instead of having 2 module params. No because the modules have different names so it will always be ide_core.something and libata.something Bartlomiej - thinking about this I question "nohpa=" because we get into unneccessary negatives ide_core.hpa= is one less inversion to figure out. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
