Re: [PATCH 05/13] block: Export I/O topology for block devices and partitions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 22 2009, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Jens" == Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> Jens> I replaced the original patch and went to apply this, but it fails
> Jens> even at the first patch. What is this against? If you want it
> Jens> queued for 2.6.31, please post it against the for-2.6.31 branch of
> Jens> the block repo.
> 
> Weird.  It was cut against your for-2.6.31 branch as of a few days ago.
> I just updated to your latest and greatest and the patches still apply
> cleanly for me.

That is weird...

> Are you sure you got the patch order right?

Using git am, it seems to pick them up in the right order:

axboe@carl:~/git/linux-2.6-block$ git am -s mkp
Applying: block: Do away with the notion of hardsect_size
Applying: block: Use accessor functions for queue limits
error: patch failed: block/blk-map.c:291
error: block/blk-map.c: patch does not apply
Patch failed at 0002 block: Use accessor functions for queue limits
When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".

My for-2.6.31 branch is at b9ed7252d219c1c663944bf03846eabb515dbe75

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystems]     [Linux SCSI]     [Linux RAID]     [Git]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Linux Newbie]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux