>>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I really hate the 'alignment' name, nobody will know wtf that is >> without looking it up. The rest of the names are fairly self >> explanatory. offset? offset_size? misalignment? Not very good with >> names, but perhaps we can find something more appropriate :-) Yeah, it's a tricky thing to convey. And despite all the other convergence otherwise happening in the standards, T10 and T13 do not agree how to describe the logical/physical alignment. Mike> I agree that 'alignment' is too terse/confusing given that it is Mike> an offset we're exposing. How about 'alignment_offset'? I thought I had already changed it to alignment_offset like we talked about a while ago. But I guess that change was only done mentally :) Jens, are you ok with that name? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
