Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Though I think most people would agree that the latter is much better, >> no? > > No, it just hides the real issue: I didn't say it's best. Just better :-) >> I think removal (rewording) of this rule has already been agreed upon, >> though not exactly yet codified. > > This is not a strict rule but in 99% cases it shows that the code could > be improved further without >80 chars lines. I don't have the stat numbers handy but the established idea is that since the texts could be up to 80-chars long (and it's a good thing), the printk line needed to output them has to be longer. IOW, breaking the text into pieces is worse. Obviously, that doesn't mean one can't do better. -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
