Hi,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 07:08:35AM +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >> It also got rebased ontop of block/for-2.6.31 after Tejun's stuff got merged.
> ...
> > Looking at creation dates I suspect that somewhere along the way
> > something was rebased?
> >
> > One quick temporary solution would be to recreate bp/pc-remove-buf
> > on top of tj/block-peek-fetch...
>
> Oh.. please use block commit. Jens didn't pull in my tree but applied
> patches on top of the block tree, so my commits shouldn't be in any
> official trees.
ok, this means we'll have to synchronize a bit here. I just scanned
the tj/block-peek-fetch changes and there will IMHO be one conflict
point with my patchset - ide_retry_pc() in ide-atapi but FWICS it won't
be a big pain to merge it since the two patchsets touch different
functionality.
So, I could wait till you sync with Jens after he has pulled
tj/block-peek-fetch and I rebase my changes on top of it. I could do
that quite fast and we'll be hitting the merge window alright.
Opinions? Better ideas?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
