Hi, On Friday 15 May 2009 07:11:18 Borislav Petkov wrote: > Hi, > > this is the newest respin of the current patchset with all issues from > the previous review round fixed: > > - 0003: fixed checkpatch issues > > - 0005: documented additional change in the commit message > > - 0009: converted to using bio_data() helper; pushed pc->buf removal to #12; > moved unrelated changes to 0010 > > - 0014: updated/fixed checkpatch issues Thanks. > It also got rebased ontop of block/for-2.6.31 after Tejun's stuff got merged. I would love to merge it but I'm hitting merge conflicts... I can pull tj/block-peek-fetch into for-next but not block/for-2.6.31... tj's top commit: author Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Fri, 8 May 2009 23:45:23 +0000 (08:45 +0900) committer Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Fri, 8 May 2009 23:45:23 +0000 (08:45 +0900) commit 18c551bb4944dec0ce2c0a854b6694ed39ab58f6 tree a2a59fd27626e930809a20546c0c02e1df498056 parent 88fd264e94d01b23339ce614be9141eb2db98e10 corresponding blocks's commit: author Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx> Fri, 8 May 2009 02:54:16 +0000 (11:54 +0900) committer Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@xxxxxxxxxx> Mon, 11 May 2009 07:52:18 +0000 (09:52 +0200) commit 9934c8c04561413609d2bc38c6b9f268cba774a4 tree 30dd8f7be54f9b2e03094de9cd03b6a9ee2909cd parent 2343046826a8ca426b07601d9593ee046c298b68 Looking at creation dates I suspect that somewhere along the way something was rebased? One quick temporary solution would be to recreate bp/pc-remove-buf on top of tj/block-peek-fetch... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
